Context is powered by the Thomson Reuters Foundation Newsroom.
Britain's foreign aid: Where does the money go?
Afghan families, who are among displaced people fleeing the violence in their provinces, sit with their belongings as they prepare to return to their provinces, at a makeshift shelter at Shahr-e Naw park, in Kabul, Afghanistan October 4, 2021. REUTERS/Jorge Silva
What’s the context?
Britain says foreign aid budget will remain capped, as watchdog probes how overseas funds are diverted to help refugees in the UK
LONDON - Britain's aid budget will not be restored to 0.7% of gross national income from its current level of 0.5% for the foreseeable future, Britain's finance minister said, adding that public spending would grow more slowly than the economy.
"It won't be possible to return to the 0.7% target until the fiscal situation allows. We remain fully committed to that target," said Jeremy Hunt, addressing parliament earlier this month as he unveiled the government's autumn spending review.
This comes after the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) launched a review into how the country's foreign aid budget is spent, as poverty-fighting cash is increasingly channelled away from overseas projects to support refugees within Britain.
Britain's Conservative government reduced overseas aid from 0.7% to 0.5% of gross national income (GNI) in 2020 in order to free up more cash for domestic spending during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite a law that enshrined the higher figure.
The move slashed billions from the annual foreign aid budget, and has impacted almost all international programmes dealing with global health and humanitarian work, according to Bond, a network of UK development agencies.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who oversaw the cut when he was finance minister, said at the time that foreign spending should return to 0.7% of economic output by 2024-2025.
Aid and justice groups say the shortfall would be a huge blow to poorer countries as they struggle to recover from the pandemic and grapple with a global cost-of-living crisis exacerbated by the war in Ukraine.
Here are all the details:
How much does Britain spend on overseas aid?
In 1970, Britain pledged to spend at least 0.7% of GNI on foreign aid as part of a U.N. pact.
It is among 30 wealthy countries including the United States, Germany and Japan that have vowed to meet this minimum commitment each year.
How does other countries' aid spending compare?
Several countries have exceeded the U.N. aid target including Germany (0.74%), Luxembourg (0.99%), Norway (0.93%) and Sweden (0.92%), according to the OECD.
The United States was the biggest cash donor last year. It spent $42.3 billion, followed by Germany ($32.2 billion), Japan ($17.6 billion), Britain, and France ($15.4 billion).
Total official development assistance (ODA) in 2021 rose by 4.4% from the previous year, the highest figure on record, the OECD said. The spike was mostly due to funds being spent on COVID-19 vaccine donations, it added.
Why is Britain changing the way aid money is spent?
Britain has been reviewing foreign, defence and security policy following its departure from the European Union.
In 2020, it merged its diplomatic and aid departments to form the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).
Charities have said that scrapping a separate development body risked money being diverted to address foreign policy interests rather than alleviating poverty, which itself fuels migration and insecurity.
Dominic Raab, the former foreign minister who oversaw the department merge, has defended the measure, saying the pandemic had shown how security, prosperity, development and foreign policy were inextricably interlinked.
Which countries receive UK aid money?
The top five countries to receive UK aid money in 2021 were Afghanistan, Nigeria, Pakistan, Ethiopia and Yemen, with almost all funds going to countries in Africa and Asia, according to government data.
In 2021, about 743 million pounds was spent on humanitarian assistance such as disaster relief, a decrease from 1.53 billion pounds ($1.85 billion) during the previous year, government data showed.
Nearly a third of the aid budget last year was spent by departments outside the FCDO - the biggest spender being the Home Office, which increased its spending by 74% to over 1 billion pounds ($1.21 billion) due to a rise in asylum seeker accommodation costs, according to official data.
The ICAI said refugee support costs within Britain have risen since 2014, and made up more than 8% of all UK aid spending in 2021, about 891 million pounds.
A September report by the U.S.-based nonprofit Center for Global Development said Britain could be using up to 3 billion pounds for hosting refugees in 2022 - a quarter of its aid budget - mainly to accommodate Ukrainians.
Over 30,000 migrants have arrived in the country via small boats so far this year, sparking calls for tougher border security from some quarters.
But charities and politicians have raised concerns over the detention centres and hotels that house newly-arrived migrants, with the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration describing the conditions of one centre as "pretty wretched".
How could recipients of UK aid be impacted by these cuts?
Aid groups say reducing the aid budget will harm the world's poorest, hinder climate action and damage Britain's reputation as a leader in international development.
Groups such as the Tropical Health and Education Trust, which supports maternal care in poorer countries, and Water Witness International, which runs climate resilient projects in Tanzania, have said all their government funding has halted.
"The UK government needs to restore aid spending to 0.7% of GNI to prevent a continual yearly cycle of uncertainty and project cuts, which leads to devastating consequences for the world's poorest people," said Richard Watts, a development finance expert at charity Save the Children.
This article was updated on Nov. 24, 2022 to include the latest figures from the government's UK aid spending report.
($1 = 0.8791 pounds)
(Reporting by Lin Taylor; Editing by Helen Popper)
Today On Context