The UN Security Council must tackle hunger for world peace

Opinion
Sierra Leone's President Julius Maada Bio addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 24, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon
Opinion

Sierra Leone's President Julius Maada Bio addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 24, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

As Sierra Leone assumes the council presidency, President Julius Maada Bio says food security key to Gaza and Sudan conflicts.

Julius Maada Bio is President of the Republic of Sierra Leone.

When the world discusses global security, we often focus on armed conflict, terrorism or nuclear tensions. Yet for hundreds of millions of people, the greatest and most immediate threat to their survival is far more fundamental: hunger.

Today, food insecurity is driving instability, fuelling grievances, and deepening fragility in ways that demand urgent global attention.

It is for this reason that, as Sierra Leone assumes the presidency of the United Nations Security Council this November, I have chosen to place food security at the heart of the global peace and security agenda.

Yesterday, I presided over a high-level open debate on “Framing the Global Dialogue: Addressing Food Insecurity as a Driver of Conflict and Ensuring Food Security for Sustainable Peace.”

Across our world, from Sudan to Gaza, from the Sahel to Haiti, food insecurity has become both a product of conflict and a trigger of further violence. The Food and Agriculture

Organization and the World Food Programme estimate that most of the acutely food-insecure people live in countries affected by conflict.

A man walks near an installation of 733 empty plates with red crosses on the sand of Copacabana beach, representing the 733 million people who suffer from hunger worldwide, ahead of the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil November 16, 2024. REUTERS/Pilar Olivares
Go DeeperIn Data: What fuels world hunger, from COVID to climate, conflict
A malnourished Palestinian boy lies on a bed at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, July 22, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas
Go DeeperGeneration of Gazan children could bear famine scars for years
Farmers load a truck with vegetables in San Ignacio, El Salvador May 13, 2020. REUTERS/Jose Cabezas
Go DeeperGlobal hunger monitor faces 'large gap' after US aid cuts

War destroys farms and markets, disrupts supply chains, displaces families and obstructs humanitarian access. At the same time, geopolitical tensions are driving global food price volatility that hits low-income countries the hardest.

When people cannot feed their families, desperation takes root. Hunger fuels unrest. It erodes social cohesion and undermines democratic stability. In recent decades, food price spikes have contributed to riots, instability, and even the collapse of governments. This is a global pattern, and one the international community can no longer ignore.

We must act together to break this cycle.

The Security Council has taken important steps, including Resolution 2417 (2018), which rightly condemns the use of starvation as a method of warfare. But the continued weaponisation of hunger and the widespread destruction of food systems in conflict zones make clear that more must be done. We need greater accountability, guaranteed humanitarian access, and stronger protection for food systems as civilian infrastructure.

We must also look beyond emergency assistance. Sustainable peace requires resilient, inclusive, and climate-smart food systems. This means investing in agriculture as a foundation for stability: creating jobs for young people, empowering women, and revitalising rural economies.

Africa is showing ambition. The Kampala CAADP Declaration lays out a bold pathway for transforming food systems by 2035: increasing production, tripling intra-African agrifood trade, reducing malnutrition, and cutting extreme poverty in half. These goals, when achieved, will not only drive economic growth but will also strengthen peace across the continent.

quote mark

We cannot achieve lasting peace while millions remain hungry.

Sierra Leone brings its own experience to this global discussion.

On the international stage, as co-chair of the Alliance of Champions for Food Systems Transformation, we are also helping to mobilize a growing coalition of nations committed to building equitable, resilient, and climate-smart food systems worldwide.

Domestically, two years ago I launched Feed Salone, a flagship initiative designed to harness the power of food systems for inclusive growth, job creation, and improved nutrition. We increased government allocations to agriculture from 2% to 7.3% and invested in the infrastructure our farmers need to succeed: roads, bridges, markets and storage facilities.

Today, we are beginning to produce more of what we eat, and the prices of key staple foods are stabilising downward for the first time in many years.

As a nation that endured a brutal civil war, we understand intimately how hunger, exclusion and hopelessness can ignite conflict. This is why Sierra Leone is choosing a different path. One where food systems become engines of peace and national resilience.

A country once associated with the tragedy of blood diamonds is now demonstrating how food and agricultural transformation can help build a peaceful, stable and prosperous nation.

But no country can do this alone. Hunger is a global threat that requires global action.

As I take the chair of the U.N. Security Council this month, my message to the international community is simple: food security is human security. We cannot achieve lasting peace while millions remain hungry. The world must recognise the right to food not only as a moral imperative, but as a strategic investment in global stability.

The seeds of peace must be sown in the soil of human dignity. Addressing hunger everywhere is not only the right thing to do, it is the surest path to a more prosperous and peaceful world.


Any views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author and not of Context or the Thomson Reuters Foundation.


Tags

  • War and conflict



Get ‘Policy, honestly’ to learn how big decisions impact ordinary people.

By providing your email, you agree to our Privacy Policy.


Latest on Context